Skip to main content

forcing a task sequence to rerun … from powershell

well, kind of.  steve rachui wrote this genius little gem about how to manage the instances of the configmgr agent scheduler to manipulate a task sequence to rerun.  as you’ll note in the post, he didn’t indicate a method to automate it.  this is actually rather easy to accomplish from powershell.

first of all, our example … we’ll use steve’s screenshots as reference.  here’s the id that we want to get rid of: CEN20018-CEN00027-DBBBC9D6.

to be quite veracious and unerring, we should use the exact task sequence id in question.  we can set that to a variable just for kicks.

$tsid = “CEN20018”
 
alright, now that we have that, let’s examine the command we’re going to use.  to get information out of wmi, we have to use the get-wmiobject cmdlet.  ordinarily, you could just provide the class name you want to look at, but as steve noted in his post, you need to connect to a different namespace: root\ccm\scheduler.  let’s retrieve all the classes of this namespace using –list.
 
get-wmiobject –namespace “root\ccm\scheduler” –list
 
 
here’s a snippet of the expected output:
...
__Win32Provider {} __SystemSecurity {GetSD, GetSecuri.. CCM_Scheduler_History {} __NotifyStatus {} __ExtendedStatus {} __SecurityRelatedClass {}
...
 

ah, there we go.  the class we’re looking for is ccm_scheduler_history.  next thing we’ll do is pull the instances of this class.  if we just pull the class, it’ll be quite a nasty output, so let’s concentrate on what’s important for now: the schedule id.

Get-WmiObject -Namespace "root\ccm\scheduler" -Class ccm_scheduler_history | ft scheduleid


now we get a succinct output of just the schedule ids.  there’s the schedule id we’re looking for!

{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000027}
{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000061}
{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000011}
{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000022}
CEN20018-CEN00027-DBBBC9D6
{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000023}
{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000031}
{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000021}


let’s pull it all together and see how it looks.

Get-WmiObject -Namespace "root\ccm\scheduler" -Class ccm_scheduler_history | where { $_.scheduleid -like "$tsid*" }


perfect.  now we got back the right instance of the class.  i’m going to set this to a new variable called $tsinstance because i’m just that creative.

$tsinstance = Get-WmiObject -Namespace "root\ccm\scheduler" -Class ccm_scheduler_history | where { $_.scheduleid -like "*$tsid*" }
 

now, finally, we’re to the point where we can get rid of the thing.  so … how?  well… as it turns out, there’s a cmdlet for that.  all we need to do is pass the object to remove-wmiobject.  that just rocks.  here’s the finished command.

$instance | Remove-WmiObject


and if you just want one long command, here’s that as well:

Get-WmiObject -Namespace "root\ccm\scheduler" -Class ccm_scheduler_history | where { $_.scheduleid -like '*CEN20018*' } | Remove-WmiObject

Comments

  1. Perfect! I found Steve's post and was trying to make it work through VBS but Powershell is even better. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

using preloadpkgonsite.exe to stage compressed copies to child site distribution points

UPDATE: john marcum sent me a kind email to let me know about a problem he ran into with preloadpkgonsite.exe in the new SCCM Toolkit V2 where under certain conditions, packages will not uncompress.  if you are using the v2 toolkit, PLEASE read this blog post before proceeding.   here’s a scenario that came up on the mssms@lists.myitforum.com mailing list. when confronted with a situation of large packages and wan links, it’s generally best to get the data to the other location without going over the wire. in this case, 75gb. :/ the “how” you get the files there is really not the most important thing to worry about. once they’re there and moved to the appropriate location, preloadpkgonsite.exe is required to install the compressed source files. once done, a status message goes back to the parent server which should stop the upstream server from copying the package source files over the wan to the child site. anyway, if it’s a relatively small amount of packages, you can

How to Identify Applications Using Your Domain Controller

Problem Everyone has been through it. We've all had to retire or replace a domain controller at some point in our checkered collective experiences. While AD provides very intelligent high availability, some applications are just plain dumb. They do not observe site awareness or participate in locating a domain controller. All they want is the name or IP of one domain controller which gets hardcoded in a configuration file somewhere, deeply embedded in some file folder or setting that you are never going to find. How do you look at a DC and decide which applications might be doing it? Packet trace? Logs? Shut it down and wait for screaming? It seems very tedious and nearly impossible. Potential Solution Obviously I wouldn't even bother posting this if I hadn't run across something interesting. :) I ran across something in draftcalled Domain Controller Isolation. Since it's in draft, I don't know that it's published yet. HOWEVER, the concept is based off

sccm: content hash fails to match

back in 2008, I wrote up a little thing about how distribution manager fails to send a package to a distribution point . even though a lot of what I wrote that for was the failure of packages to get delivered to child sites, the result was pretty much the same. when the client tries to run the advertisement with an old package, the result was a failure because of content mismatch. I went through an ordeal recently capturing these exact kinds of failures and corrected quite a number of problems with these packages. the resulting blog post is my effort to capture how these problems were resolved. if nothing else, it's a basic checklist of things you can use.   DETECTION status messages take a look at your status messages. this has to be the easiest way to determine where these problems exist. unfortunately, it requires that a client is already experiencing problems. there are client logs you can examine as well such as cas, but I wasn't even sure I was going to have enough m