Skip to main content

using preloadpkgonsite.exe to stage compressed copies to child site distribution points

UPDATE: john marcum sent me a kind email to let me know about a problem he ran into with preloadpkgonsite.exe in the new SCCM Toolkit V2 where under certain conditions, packages will not uncompress.  if you are using the v2 toolkit, PLEASE read this blog post before proceeding.

 

here’s a scenario that came up on the mssms@lists.myitforum.com mailing list. when confronted with a situation of large packages and wan links, it’s generally best to get the data to the other location without going over the wire. in this case, 75gb. :/

the “how” you get the files there is really not the most important thing to worry about. once they’re there and moved to the appropriate location, preloadpkgonsite.exe is required to install the compressed source files. once done, a status message goes back to the parent server which should stop the upstream server from copying the package source files over the wan to the child site.

anyway, if it’s a relatively small amount of packages, you can run the execution like so:

preloadpkgonsite.exe <pkgid>

of course, if it was a small amount of packages, we wouldn’t be having this conversation right now. so what do you do when you have an enormous directory with 75gb worth of packages?

well, it would look a little something like this…

  1. on the site server, navigate to <installdir>\bin\i386. this is where the preloadpkgonsite.exe should have been dropped.
  2. run the following command:
for /f "delims=." %a in ('dir /b \\<siteserver>\sms_<sitecode>\inboxes\pkginfo.box\*.pkg') do preloadpkgonsite.exe %a

that will effectively run preloadpkgonsite.exe against every known package on that child site server. now there are caveats to making this work – one being that the .pkg has to exist on the child site server.

i’m really blogging this for sherry kissinger who wrote this excellent blog article on replacing secondary site servers. she claims she doesn’t want to dig this up in her email. i think really, she didn’t want to be bothered with having to blog this. :)

this is just a small part to an overall solution for managing sites across the wan. make sure you read the information associated with the preloadpkgonsite.exe tool to understand the caveats and dependencies.

Comments

  1. Oh come on now... It was your work! If I blogged it, I wouldn't have explained as eloquently as you have.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've updated that blog entry to point over here for preloadpkgonsite instructions.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Folks, are we supposed to use the .PCK files or the .PKG files? I see posts indicating to use the .PCK files.

    ~B

    ReplyDelete
  4. if you're talking about which files to copy, you use the .pck files - which are the compressed copies. the information in this blog post uses the .pkg files to grab only the names of the files. this is used to indicate to the tool which pkg ids to preload.

    hope that helps...

    ReplyDelete
  5. john marcum pointed out that i screwed up the cmd line. :) i left off the /b. it's fixed now in the post.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Actually if you change the script a little to make it grab the package names from the pck files instead of the pkg files this ensures that your command actually runs against all the packages that you have pck files for.

    so use this command aftercopying the pck files to the server.

    for /f "delims=." %a in ('dir /b E:\smspkg\*.pck') do preloadpkgonsite.exe %a

    onviously replace e: with the correct drive letter though.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Guys,
    Thanks very much for this post.
    I have this issue where the packages have already been pushed to BDPs connected via slow links. As we have hit the 7 Day limit on package distribution, many of the packages are in "Install Pending" state (and have stopped package distribution).
    I have managed to get all the packages to the BDPs via courier and I have also copied it to the SMSPKGC$
    Is there anything that can be done to refresh the package status of the BDPs in the SCCM Primary site?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

how to retrieve your ip address with powershell...

update: this is how it’s performed in powershell v3 as demonstrated here.(get-netadapter | get-netipaddress | ? addressfamily -eq'IPv4').ipaddress update: this is by far the easiest.PS C:\temp> (gwmi Win32_NetworkAdapterConfiguration | ? { $_.IPAddress -ne $null }).ipaddress
192.168.1.101
are you laughing yet?  i know you probably find this topic amusing.  it's really interesting though.  whenever you get over it, i'll do this in the standard cmd.exe interpreter and then in powershell to show you what kind of coolness powershell does.done?  okay, good.  this is an interpretation of a demo that bob wells did at our smug meeting.  hope you like it.i should tell you, it's not as simple as the title would lead you to believe.  i like doing that little slight-of-hand thing since it gives the impression that i'm painting a very easy target on my back for your criticism (though it's probably true in other ways)!  the idea is that we want to retrieve just the ip ad…

understanding the “ad op master is inconsistent” alert

i use the term “understanding” loosely.  this is by far no definitive guide on this particular alert, just a few things i have picked up in my attempt to understand it.let’s look at the context of the alert:The Domain Controller's Op Master is inconsitent. See additional alerts for details.
first of all, it gives very little information.  the only particularly useful detail is that it indicates which server is having the issue.  other than that, just a spelling error as there are no additional critical alerts to look at for details.this rule, as you know, comes from a sealed mp.  therefore, we can’t modify anything in it except the overrides.  the couple i’ve tinkered with are:interval (sec) log success event to begin with, interval (sec) is just set way too high.  the default is 60 seconds.  why on earth would anyone want to know that your op master consistency may be off, every minute?  actually, i could think of a few reasons, but really, it’s overkill.  the way the script works…

sccm: content hash fails to match

back in 2008, I wrote up a little thing about how distribution manager fails to send a package to a distribution point. even though a lot of what I wrote that for was the failure of packages to get delivered to child sites, the result was pretty much the same. when the client tries to run the advertisement with an old package, the result was a failure because of content mismatch.I went through an ordeal recently capturing these exact kinds of failures and corrected quite a number of problems with these packages. the resulting blog post is my effort to capture how these problems were resolved. if nothing else, it's a basic checklist of things you can use.DETECTIONstatus messagestake a look at your status messages. this has to be the easiest way to determine where these problems exist. unfortunately, it requires that a client is already experiencing problems. there are client logs you can examine as well such as cas, but I wasn't even sure I was going to have enough material to …