Skip to main content

sms: maybe you should date your clients? :^)

i don't think it's too much of a stretch or really a broad assumption that any given collection at probably any given site has some amount of stale information.  machines go offline, people go on vacation, machines "mysteriously" drop off the domain...

this tends to come up often so i thought i'd put it out there.  it's all over the place though.  do a search for "sms datediff", "sms getdate", or "sms dateadd".  my guess is the first one will be the most beneficial since it's the one most people use.  if you find that you have too many old machines showing up in your collections, try something like this:

select    SMS_R_System.ResourceID 
from      SMS_R_System inner join SMS_G_System_WORKSTATION_STATUS on
          SMS_G_System_WORKSTATION_STATUS.ResourceID = SMS_R_System.ResourceId
where DATEDIFF(dd,SMS_G_System_WORKSTATION_STATUS.LastHardwareScan,GetDate()) < 14


datediff looks for these parts: what to measure, the starting date, the ending date.  in our evaluation, we're measuring by the day, looking at the lasthardwarescan value and using the current date to check against.  we take that value and check to see if it's less than 14.  if it is, cool.  show it.  if not, drop it.

you can do this in sql, too.  no doubt you want to make your reports not show old crap.  here's an example of what a sql statement would look like:

select distinct
            sys.ad_site_name0 as [Site],
            cs.name0 as [CI Name],
            cs.manufacturer0 as [Manufacturer],
            cs.model0 as [Model],
            se.serialnumber0 as [Serial #]
from  v_GS_COMPUTER_SYSTEM cs
            inner join v_GS_SYSTEM_ENCLOSURE se on cs.resourceid=se.resourceid
            inner join v_R_SYSTEM sys on cs.resourceid=sys.resourceid
            inner join v_GS_WORKSTATION_STATUS ws on cs.resourceid=ws.resourceid
where DATEDIFF(day, ws.lasthwscan, getdate()) < 14

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

using preloadpkgonsite.exe to stage compressed copies to child site distribution points

UPDATE: john marcum sent me a kind email to let me know about a problem he ran into with preloadpkgonsite.exe in the new SCCM Toolkit V2 where under certain conditions, packages will not uncompress.  if you are using the v2 toolkit, PLEASE read this blog post before proceeding.   here’s a scenario that came up on the mssms@lists.myitforum.com mailing list. when confronted with a situation of large packages and wan links, it’s generally best to get the data to the other location without going over the wire. in this case, 75gb. :/ the “how” you get the files there is really not the most important thing to worry about. once they’re there and moved to the appropriate location, preloadpkgonsite.exe is required to install the compressed source files. once done, a status message goes back to the parent server which should stop the upstream server from copying the package source files over the wan to the child site. anyway, if it’s a relatively small amount of packages, you can

How to Identify Applications Using Your Domain Controller

Problem Everyone has been through it. We've all had to retire or replace a domain controller at some point in our checkered collective experiences. While AD provides very intelligent high availability, some applications are just plain dumb. They do not observe site awareness or participate in locating a domain controller. All they want is the name or IP of one domain controller which gets hardcoded in a configuration file somewhere, deeply embedded in some file folder or setting that you are never going to find. How do you look at a DC and decide which applications might be doing it? Packet trace? Logs? Shut it down and wait for screaming? It seems very tedious and nearly impossible. Potential Solution Obviously I wouldn't even bother posting this if I hadn't run across something interesting. :) I ran across something in draftcalled Domain Controller Isolation. Since it's in draft, I don't know that it's published yet. HOWEVER, the concept is based off

sccm: content hash fails to match

back in 2008, I wrote up a little thing about how distribution manager fails to send a package to a distribution point . even though a lot of what I wrote that for was the failure of packages to get delivered to child sites, the result was pretty much the same. when the client tries to run the advertisement with an old package, the result was a failure because of content mismatch. I went through an ordeal recently capturing these exact kinds of failures and corrected quite a number of problems with these packages. the resulting blog post is my effort to capture how these problems were resolved. if nothing else, it's a basic checklist of things you can use.   DETECTION status messages take a look at your status messages. this has to be the easiest way to determine where these problems exist. unfortunately, it requires that a client is already experiencing problems. there are client logs you can examine as well such as cas, but I wasn't even sure I was going to have enough m