Skip to main content

sccm: the required permissions for creating collections

i had modeled a concept for how i wanted to lay out permissions only to find out the permissions i created for managing collections was wrong – specifically, the creation of collections. after spending some time messing around with sccm 2012 (configmgr for you purists), i was able to work out the exact requirements for creating collections. what a pain since there is no documentation for what the permissions actually perform! (admittedly, most of it is self-explanatory just by the permission name itself.)

after doing a little digging (referred to some as trial and error), it turns out that a specific permission, modify folder, is required. by all appearances as blogged by others, it seems this is a bug. i didn’t bother to go into the bug tracker to figure out where this was in the development cycle. at any rate, keep that in mind. you’ll need it.

so, with the following permission set:

  • create
  • read

you basically get a slap across the face. there is no visible dialog to create a collection. however, once you add modify folder you will get the familiar create collection option. the permissions are defined as such:

  • create
  • modify folder
  • read

if you work with folders, the story is not yet complete. you will notice you are only able to create collections from the root. if you attempt to do so from a folder, you get another face slap. it turns out, you also need another obscure right. this one is move object. after adding move object, you get the permission to create the collection when you click on a folder. permissions are defined as such:

  • create
  • modify folder
  • move object
  • read

and now you can create collections at the root, on folders, etc. here’s a screenshot that shows the applied permissions. hope it helps.

image

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

using preloadpkgonsite.exe to stage compressed copies to child site distribution points

UPDATE: john marcum sent me a kind email to let me know about a problem he ran into with preloadpkgonsite.exe in the new SCCM Toolkit V2 where under certain conditions, packages will not uncompress.  if you are using the v2 toolkit, PLEASE read this blog post before proceeding.   here’s a scenario that came up on the mssms@lists.myitforum.com mailing list. when confronted with a situation of large packages and wan links, it’s generally best to get the data to the other location without going over the wire. in this case, 75gb. :/ the “how” you get the files there is really not the most important thing to worry about. once they’re there and moved to the appropriate location, preloadpkgonsite.exe is required to install the compressed source files. once done, a status message goes back to the parent server which should stop the upstream server from copying the package source files over the wan to the child site. anyway, if it’s a relatively small amount of packages, you can

How to Identify Applications Using Your Domain Controller

Problem Everyone has been through it. We've all had to retire or replace a domain controller at some point in our checkered collective experiences. While AD provides very intelligent high availability, some applications are just plain dumb. They do not observe site awareness or participate in locating a domain controller. All they want is the name or IP of one domain controller which gets hardcoded in a configuration file somewhere, deeply embedded in some file folder or setting that you are never going to find. How do you look at a DC and decide which applications might be doing it? Packet trace? Logs? Shut it down and wait for screaming? It seems very tedious and nearly impossible. Potential Solution Obviously I wouldn't even bother posting this if I hadn't run across something interesting. :) I ran across something in draftcalled Domain Controller Isolation. Since it's in draft, I don't know that it's published yet. HOWEVER, the concept is based off

sccm: content hash fails to match

back in 2008, I wrote up a little thing about how distribution manager fails to send a package to a distribution point . even though a lot of what I wrote that for was the failure of packages to get delivered to child sites, the result was pretty much the same. when the client tries to run the advertisement with an old package, the result was a failure because of content mismatch. I went through an ordeal recently capturing these exact kinds of failures and corrected quite a number of problems with these packages. the resulting blog post is my effort to capture how these problems were resolved. if nothing else, it's a basic checklist of things you can use.   DETECTION status messages take a look at your status messages. this has to be the easiest way to determine where these problems exist. unfortunately, it requires that a client is already experiencing problems. there are client logs you can examine as well such as cas, but I wasn't even sure I was going to have enough m