Skip to main content

recurring schedule behavior in sms / sccm agents

background

while investigating long boot/logon cycles, i came to the realization that there really is no documented statement on how a sms agent behaves when set against a recurring schedule.  here’s a really brief summary of what i’ve discovered so far.

first of all, it turns out that regardless of the type of recurring situation, it’s always the same.  this means whether it’s inventory or software distribution the behavior is exactly alike.  i know there’s some confusion about this… but this is what i’m seeing.

basically when an agent does not miss its schedule, it runs as it should.  duh.  i don’t know why that took me so long to process, but i finally get it now!  really!  let me explain, if you still don’t follow.

 

inventory behavior

i have a computer named “myLaptop”.  myLaptop goes home in the evenings with me and stays off since i refuse to work outside of normal business hours.  because of this, when i log on the next morning, all kinds of things happen – whether i like it or not.  :|  squaring away our environmental details, here is what the schedule for myLaptop inventory times look like:

inventoryAction lastReportDate schedule
hardware 1/28/2009 11:32:51 AM once/day
software 1/26/2009 4:33:52 PM once/5 days
heartbeat 1/28/2009 4:42:46 PM once/day

 

while myLaptop is turned off, it misses the scheduled execution for hardware inventory and heartbeat discovery.  i fire up the laptop at 1/28/2009 5:01:00 PM --because of this, the agent runs both hardware and discovery in tandem.  now if i reboot or restart the agent at any point until its next scheduled time, the agent will NOT run the inventories again

since software inventory is every 5 days, the laptop hasn’t missed its scheduled execution.  therefore, software inventory does not execute again.  if i had started the laptop at 1/31/2009, it would have run all 3 since every scheduled inventory would have been missed.

when inventory does fire off, all of the lastReportDate time frames will be reset to the current datetime value.  therefore, the machine will not run the inventory cycles again until the new scheduled times.

 

software distribution behavior

software distribution behaves exactly as i’ve detailed above.  it makes more sense though with software distribution since you control the mandatory execution timeframe.  also, it never changes the time frame.  if it misses an execution and has to run it, it doesn’t go reset the next scheduled time.  it runs again when you’ve scheduled it to go.

 

additional information

if you’re not familiar with the inventories i’ve mentioned below, they exist in the wmi class InventoryActionStatus.  This class resides in the namespace “root\ccm\invagt”.

from within wbemtest, you can view the details of the schedules by executing the following query:

select * from inventoryactionstatus
 

keep in mind that running the query in wmi returns all date fields in cim_datetime format.  if you want to see it in a better output, try this powershell command:

get-wmiobject -Namespace 'root\ccm\invagt' -Query 'select * from inventoryactionstatus' | ft -property InventoryActionID, @{label="ReportDate";expression={$_.ConvertToDateTime($_.LastReportDate)}}

 

you’ll get a list of inventory action ids.  you can find their translation here.

 

acknowledgement

thanks goes to mark mears.  :)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

using preloadpkgonsite.exe to stage compressed copies to child site distribution points

UPDATE: john marcum sent me a kind email to let me know about a problem he ran into with preloadpkgonsite.exe in the new SCCM Toolkit V2 where under certain conditions, packages will not uncompress.  if you are using the v2 toolkit, PLEASE read this blog post before proceeding.   here’s a scenario that came up on the mssms@lists.myitforum.com mailing list. when confronted with a situation of large packages and wan links, it’s generally best to get the data to the other location without going over the wire. in this case, 75gb. :/ the “how” you get the files there is really not the most important thing to worry about. once they’re there and moved to the appropriate location, preloadpkgonsite.exe is required to install the compressed source files. once done, a status message goes back to the parent server which should stop the upstream server from copying the package source files over the wan to the child site. anyway, if it’s a relatively small amount of packages, you can

How to Identify Applications Using Your Domain Controller

Problem Everyone has been through it. We've all had to retire or replace a domain controller at some point in our checkered collective experiences. While AD provides very intelligent high availability, some applications are just plain dumb. They do not observe site awareness or participate in locating a domain controller. All they want is the name or IP of one domain controller which gets hardcoded in a configuration file somewhere, deeply embedded in some file folder or setting that you are never going to find. How do you look at a DC and decide which applications might be doing it? Packet trace? Logs? Shut it down and wait for screaming? It seems very tedious and nearly impossible. Potential Solution Obviously I wouldn't even bother posting this if I hadn't run across something interesting. :) I ran across something in draftcalled Domain Controller Isolation. Since it's in draft, I don't know that it's published yet. HOWEVER, the concept is based off

sccm: content hash fails to match

back in 2008, I wrote up a little thing about how distribution manager fails to send a package to a distribution point . even though a lot of what I wrote that for was the failure of packages to get delivered to child sites, the result was pretty much the same. when the client tries to run the advertisement with an old package, the result was a failure because of content mismatch. I went through an ordeal recently capturing these exact kinds of failures and corrected quite a number of problems with these packages. the resulting blog post is my effort to capture how these problems were resolved. if nothing else, it's a basic checklist of things you can use.   DETECTION status messages take a look at your status messages. this has to be the easiest way to determine where these problems exist. unfortunately, it requires that a client is already experiencing problems. there are client logs you can examine as well such as cas, but I wasn't even sure I was going to have enough m